linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] MFD: MAX8997: IRQ definition moved to public header.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110630055719.GA930@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:57:20 -0700
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	myungjoo.ham@...il.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
	Donggeun Kim <dg77.kim@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] MFD: MAX8997: IRQ definition moved to public header.

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 02:56:27PM +0900, MyungJoo Ham wrote:

> In order to request MAX8997's IRQs, these IRQ enums are required by
> board files (such as /arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-*.c). So, these IRQ
> enums are no more "private" to max8997 device drivers. Without this
> patch, board files need to include max8997-private.h.

Why does the board file need to request these IRQs?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/