[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110701081725.GC28322@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 04:17:25 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"gregkh@...e.de" <gregkh@...e.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.osdl.org" <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
"Abhishek Kane (Mindtree Consulting PVT LTD)"
<v-abkane@...rosoft.com>, Hank Janssen <hjanssen@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/40] Staging: hv: storvsc: On I/O get the correct IDE
device
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 09:15:54PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> That is what I did initially. Then looking at the way we were handling scsi devices
> where each scsi controller configured for the guest results in an emulated HBA
> (scsi host) in the guest and all the block devices under a given controller are
> handled through this one host, I decided to mimic a similar structure - one
> scsi host for all the block devices configured as an IDE device.
>
> I can go back to my earlier implementation with one host per disk.
Was there any downside you noticed from using one host per emulated
disk?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists