linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] ASoC: wm8731: rework power management

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4E0D9401.1070300@atmel.com>
Date:	Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:31:45 +0200
From:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC:	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, lrg@...com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ASoC: wm8731: rework power management

Le 30/06/2011 17:22, Mark Brown :
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 03:57:12PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> 
> Please fix your mailer to line wrap within paragraphs.
> 
>> First of all, I experienced issues while not having OSC enabled during
>> suspend/resume cycle. Am I right supposing that, if using oscillator
>> to clock the codec, I have to keep it running during a suspend/resume
>> cycle?
> 
> No, not at all.  What makes you believe that you would you need to do
> that?

Ok, I re-tested and for sure I was totally wrong! So we forget this part
of the patch.
I guess that this belief may come from my first implementation on 2.6.35
where OSC was not part of the DAPM... Sory for the noise.

I repost the "active bit" part real-soon-now.

Thanks for your help, best regards,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/