[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110701115600.GK20990@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 13:56:00 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Chris Evans <scarybeasts@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
djm@...drot.org, segoon@...nwall.com, kees.cook@...onical.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, fweisbec@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 05/13] seccomp_filter: Document what seccomp_filter is
and how it works.
* James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2011, Will Drewry wrote:
>
> > Since it seems that there'll be consumers (openssh, vsftpd,
> > kvm/qemu, chromium, chromium os) and feedback quieted down, what
> > are the next steps to get this to a pull/no-pull decision points
> > (or at least some Ack's or Nack's)? I know this patch series
> > crosses a number of maintainers, and I never know exactly what's
> > next when the feedback slows down.
>
> Are there any outstanding objections to this approach? How do the
> tracing folk feel about it?
I think i outlined my objections a couple of times and haven't seen
them addressed.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists