linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 34/40] Staging: hv: storvsc: Add the contents of hyperv_storage.h to storvsc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 1 Jul 2011 12:48:44 +0000
From:	KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC:	"gregkh@...e.de" <gregkh@...e.de>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
	"virtualization@...ts.osdl.org" <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
	"Abhishek Kane (Mindtree Consulting PVT LTD)" 
	<v-abkane@...rosoft.com>, "Hank Janssen" <hjanssen@...rosoft.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 34/40] Staging: hv: storvsc: Add the contents of
 hyperv_storage.h to storvsc_drv.c



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:hch@...radead.org]
> Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 4:16 AM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig; gregkh@...e.de; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> devel@...uxdriverproject.org; virtualization@...ts.osdl.org; Haiyang Zhang;
> Abhishek Kane (Mindtree Consulting PVT LTD); Hank Janssen
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 34/40] Staging: hv: storvsc: Add the contents of
> hyperv_storage.h to storvsc_drv.c
> 
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 08:13:51PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > > > Add the contents of hyperv_storage.h to storvsc_drv.c and cleanup
> > > storvsc_drv.c.n
> > >
> > > I'd at least leave the first half of the header that defines the
> > > protocol around.
> >
> > I only got rid of the block comment at the start of hyperv_storage.h
> > and consolidated the include files. Nothing of substance was deleted.
> 
> I meant to say keeping a separate header file for the protocol defintion
> might be a good idea.  That way it is kept separate from the
> implementation details
> 
Ok; I get it. Although, a while ago as I was cleaning up the header files
In preparation to exiting staging, Greg had indicated that each driver
should, if possible be a single file. I merged the relevant files to comply
with that directive. 

Regards,

K. Y
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/