lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1309527416.12449.729.camel@twins>
Date:	Fri, 01 Jul 2011 15:36:56 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
Cc:	Francis Moreau <francis.moro@...il.com>,
	"linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org" 
	<linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [tip:perf/core] perf: Ignore non-sampling overflows

On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 14:47 +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> 
> It covers the case there the sampling period may be specified in the
> raw config register (line 286). I know, this is not the preferred way,
> but this way you can directly set the config value in perf without
> bypassing some bits through event->attr. As IBS events are sampling
> events I will change the code so that it writes back the specified
> period to event->attr.sample_period/event->hw.sample_period. Something
> like:
> 
>         if (event->hw.sample_period) {
>                 ...
>         } else {
>                 max_cnt = event->attr.config & map->cnt_mask;
>                 event->attr.sample_period = max_cnt << 4;
>                 event->hw.sample_period = event->attr.sample_period;
>         }
> 
> This will then proper identify IBS samples as samling event.

Ah, being a naught boy then ;-), yeah passing stuff through like that
will confuse bits and the fixup you propose will indeed work around
that.

But why complicate things like this? You just add extra code to the init
path since you need to support attr.sample_period input as well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ