[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201107012206.42475.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 22:06:42 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>,
Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...e.de>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/10 v6] PM / Domains: Don't stop wakeup devices during system sleep transitions
On Friday, July 01, 2011, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > So the only way forward I can see is to add a special PM domain callback,
> > say .active_wakeup(), that will return "true" if the device is to be left
> > active if wakeup-enabled. So the check you don't like will become
> > something like:
> >
> > if (device_may_wakeup(dev) && genpd->active_wakeup
> > && genpd->active_wakeup(dev))
> > return 0;
> >
> > Would that be better?
>
> Another option, less flexible but perhaps easier to use, would be to
> set a couple of bitflags indicating whether the device needs power or
> clocks to handle wakeup signals.
Well, I agree, but I've decided to add the new callback after all.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists