[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E0D3612.6040701@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:50:58 -0300
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...ibm.com>,
Eric B Munson <emunson@...bm.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/9] KVM-GST: KVM Steal time accounting
On 06/30/2011 06:54 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 11:29 -0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
>> This patch accounts steal time time in kernel/sched.
>> I kept it from last proposal, because I still see advantages
>> in it: Doing it here will give us easier access from scheduler
>> variables such as the cpu rq. The next patch shows an example of
>> usage for it.
>>
>> Since functions like account_idle_time() can be called from
>> multiple places, not only account_process_tick(), steal time
>> grabbing is repeated in each account function separatedely.
>>
>
> That changelog is so going to frustrate someone trying to re-create your
> thinking in a year's time. They really don't care about the last
> proposals and the next patch.
You're right. I'll review all changelogs and rewrite them as needed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists