linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] plist: add mutex to the blessed lock type for plists

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1309601390.10073.13.camel@twins>
Date:	Sat, 02 Jul 2011 12:09:50 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Dima Zavin <dima@...roid.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] plist: add mutex to the blessed lock type for plists

On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 18:45 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 15:14 -0700, Dima Zavin wrote:
> > Steve,
> > 
> > So what would do you recommend I do? Is this patch acceptable or do
> > you want me to remove all the debug stuff and modify all the users to
> > not provide a lock?
> > 
> 
> I'm fine either way. I would like to know what Thomas, Ingo and Peter
> think.

I've always been annoyed with that check, just rip it out.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/