linux-kernel - Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [RFC v1] implement SL*B and stack usercopy runtime checks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1309721875.18925.30.camel@Joe-Laptop>
Date:	Sun, 03 Jul 2011 12:37:55 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
Cc:	kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [RFC v1] implement SL*B and stack
 usercopy runtime checks

On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 23:24 +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> Btw, if the perfomance will be acceptable, what do you think about
> logging/reacting on the spotted overflows?

If you do, it might be useful to track the found location(s)
and only emit the overflow log entry once as found.

Maybe use __builtin_return_address(depth) for tracking.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/