| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <201107040011.32254.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 00:11:31 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Andrea Righi <andrea@...terlinux.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>,
Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI: fix acpi_power_off lockdep splat
On Sunday, July 03, 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, July 03, 2011, Andrea Righi wrote:
> > Implement acpi_os_create_lock() as a C-preprocessor macro to suppress
> > lockdep false positive.
> >
> > When lockdep is enabled the spin_lock_init macro stringifies it's
> > argument and uses that as a name for the lock in the debugging.
> >
> > By executing spin_lock_init in a macro the key changes from "lock" for
> > all locks to the actual argument of acpi_os_create_lock()
> > ("&acpi_gbl_global_lock_pending_lock", "&acpi_gbl_gpe_lock" or
> > "&acpi_gbl_hardware_lock" for now).
> >
> > This fixes:
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38152
> >
> > ChangeLog (v1 -> v2):
> > - avoid to call spin_lock_init multiple times on the same lock
> > - rewrite patch description (thanks to Florian for providing a better
> > description of the patch)
> >
> > Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> > CC: Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea@...terlinux.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/osl.c | 3 +--
> > include/acpi/acpiosxf.h | 12 +++++++++++-
> > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> > index 52ca964..4c985d3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> > @@ -1336,14 +1336,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_resources_are_enforced);
> > * Create and initialize a spinlock.
> > */
> > acpi_status
> > -acpi_os_create_lock(acpi_spinlock *out_handle)
> > +__acpi_os_create_lock(acpi_spinlock *out_handle)
> > {
>
> I would rename this to acpi_os_allocate_lock() or acpi_os_alloc_lock(),
> so that it doesn't suggest the lock is initialized by this function.
>
> Hmm. There's one more thing we need to take into account here. Namely,
> include/acpi/acpiosxf.h is used by other OSes, so we shouldn't put
> Linux-specific stuff into it.
>
> I'm not sure how to work around that at the moment.
OK, the patch below builds for me and seems to work even, although I haven't
tested it with lockdep on.
Thanks,
Rafael
---
drivers/acpi/osl.c | 25 -------------------------
include/acpi/acpiosxf.h | 8 --------
include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/osl.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/osl.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/osl.c
@@ -1333,31 +1333,6 @@ int acpi_resources_are_enforced(void)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_resources_are_enforced);
/*
- * Create and initialize a spinlock.
- */
-acpi_status
-acpi_os_create_lock(acpi_spinlock *out_handle)
-{
- spinlock_t *lock;
-
- lock = ACPI_ALLOCATE(sizeof(spinlock_t));
- if (!lock)
- return AE_NO_MEMORY;
- spin_lock_init(lock);
- *out_handle = lock;
-
- return AE_OK;
-}
-
-/*
- * Deallocate the memory for a spinlock.
- */
-void acpi_os_delete_lock(acpi_spinlock handle)
-{
- ACPI_FREE(handle);
-}
-
-/*
* Acquire a spinlock.
*
* handle is a pointer to the spinlock_t.
Index: linux-2.6/include/acpi/acpiosxf.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/acpi/acpiosxf.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/acpi/acpiosxf.h
@@ -95,14 +95,6 @@ acpi_status
acpi_os_table_override(struct acpi_table_header *existing_table,
struct acpi_table_header **new_table);
-/*
- * Spinlock primitives
- */
-acpi_status
-acpi_os_create_lock(acpi_spinlock *out_handle);
-
-void acpi_os_delete_lock(acpi_spinlock handle);
-
acpi_cpu_flags acpi_os_acquire_lock(acpi_spinlock handle);
void acpi_os_release_lock(acpi_spinlock handle, acpi_cpu_flags flags);
Index: linux-2.6/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h
@@ -159,6 +159,26 @@ static inline void *acpi_os_acquire_obje
} while (0)
#endif
+/*
+ * Spinlock primitives
+ */
+
+#define acpi_os_create_lock(__handle) \
+({ \
+ spinlock_t *lock = ACPI_ALLOCATE(sizeof(*lock)); \
+ \
+ if (lock) { \
+ *(__handle) = lock; \
+ spin_lock_init(*(__handle)); \
+ } \
+ lock ? AE_OK : AE_NO_MEMORY; \
+})
+
+#define acpi_os_delete_lock(__handle) \
+ do { \
+ ACPI_FREE(__handle); \
+ } while (0)
+
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
#endif /* __ACLINUX_H__ */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists