[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201107042110.EDI30723.OLFHOtQSMOFFJV@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 21:10:43 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: richard@....at
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][Resend v2] Fix infinite loop in search_binary_handler()
Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am Montag 04 Juli 2011, 13:51:55 schrieb Tetsuo Handa:
> > Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > > Running a x86_64 kernel without ia32 emulation and a x86 user land
> > > triggers this issue.
> >
> > Executing /sbin/modprobe for x86_32 on an x86_64 kernel without x86_32
> > support?
>
> Yep.
>
> > Anyway, request_module() calls __request_module() but
> > __request_module() stops at MAX_KMOD_CONCURRENT levels of nesting.
> > So, I think "infinite loop" cannot happen.
>
> Booting a x86_64 UML kernel with x86_32 user land triggers this issue.
> I always wondered why the UML kernel hangs an consumes 100% CPU.
That's strange... Would you show us printk() output like
printk(KERN_INFO "Calling request_module()\n");
request_module("binfmt-%04x", *(unsigned short *)(&bprm->buf[2]));
printk(KERN_INFO "Returned from request_module()\n");
for demonstrating that __request_module() cannot stop at
MAX_KMOD_CONCURRENT levels of nesting?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists