[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110704143655.GE5551@somewhere>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 16:36:57 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"acme@...stprotocols.net" <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf: add context field to perf_event
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 05:10:20PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/04/2011 04:58 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> >Another thing I would like to do in the even longer term is to not use perf anymore
> >for ptrace breakpoints, because that involves a heavy dependency and few people are
> >happy with that. Instead we should just have a generic hook into the sched_switch()
> >and handle pure ptrace breakpoints there. The central breakpoint API would still be
> >there to reserve/schedule breakpoint resources between ptrace and perf.
> >
>
> 'struct preempt_notifier' may be the hook you're looking for.
Yeah looks like a perfect fit as it's per task.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists