[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201107042342.HDH34381.OFtHSLOMVFJFOQ@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 23:42:09 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: richard@....at
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][Resend v2] Fix infinite loop in search_binary_handler()
Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > That's strange... Would you show us printk() output like
> >
> > printk(KERN_INFO "Calling request_module()\n");
> > request_module("binfmt-%04x", *(unsigned short *)(&bprm->buf[2]));
> > printk(KERN_INFO "Returned from request_module()\n");
> >
> > for demonstrating that __request_module() cannot stop at
> > MAX_KMOD_CONCURRENT levels of nesting?
>
> There you go!
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~rw/boot.log
>
> I did not count all messages, but they are more than 50. :-)
Thank you.
$ grep -F 'Calling request_module()' boot.log | wc -l
25819
$ grep -F 'Returned from request_module()' boot.log | wc -l
25770
So, __request_module() is stopping at MAX_KMOD_CONCURRENT levels
of nesting. Eventually the process that triggered the first
request_module() will return from search_binary_handler().
I don't think this is an infinite loop inside search_binary_handler().
But it would look like an infinite loop bug if the caller of execve()
repeats forever. Printing additional information like
printk(KERN_INFO "Calling request_module() %s %d %s %d %d\n", current->comm,
current->pid, bprm->filename, bprm->argc, bprm->envc);
would help.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists