[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110704173320.GR3021@sortiz-mobl>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 19:33:20 +0200
From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Graeme Gregory <gg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@...mlogic.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: Don't leak init_data in tps65910_i2c_probe
Hi Jesper,
On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 09:21:38PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> There are a couple of situations where we leak init_data in
> drivers/mfd/tps65910.c:tps65910_i2c_probe() - this patch should take
> care of them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/tps65910.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Compile tested only.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c b/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c
> index 2229e66..0db62f4 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c
> @@ -144,15 +144,17 @@ static int tps65910_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
> return -EINVAL;
>
> init_data = kzalloc(sizeof(struct tps65910_platform_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (init_data == NULL)
> + if (!init_data)
This is not a memory leak fix. And I actually prefer the == NULL check.
Please remove the == NULL check replacement with !* and keep only the memory
leak fixing part.
Cheers,
Samuel.
--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists