[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ0PZbQJadxCu=b4JWun29gdPpdsJPiP0WdqmSJK5px5nQRpgA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 16:15:22 +0900
From: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Jiejing Zhang <kzjeef@...il.com>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...gle.com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] PM / DEVFREQ: add sysfs interface (including user tickling)
Hello,
2011/7/3 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>:
> On Friday, May 27, 2011, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
>> 1. System-wide sysfs interface
>> - tickle_all R: number of tickle_all execution
>> W: tickle all devfreq devices
>> - min_interval R: devfreq monitoring base interval in ms
>> - monitoring R: shows whether devfreq monitoring is active or
>> not.
>>
>> 2. Device specific sysfs interface
>> - tickle R: number of tickle execution for the device
>> W: tickle the device
>>
>> Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
>>
>> --
>> Changed from v2
>> - add ABI entries for devfreq sysfs interface
>> ---
>> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-devfreq | 21 ++++
>> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-power | 43 ++++++++
>> drivers/base/power/devfreq.c | 133 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> include/linux/devfreq.h | 3 +
>> 4 files changed, 199 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-devfreq
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-devfreq b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-devfreq
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..7f35a64
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-devfreq
>> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
>> +What: /sys/devices/.../devfreq/
>> +Date: May 2011
>> +Contact: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
>> +Description:
>> + The /sys/device/.../devfreq directory will contain files
>> + that provide interfaces to DEVFREQ for a specific device.
>> +
>> +What: /sys/devices/.../devfreq/tickle
>> +Date: May 2011
>> +Contact: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
>> +Description:
>> + The /sys/devices/.../devfreq/tickle file allows user space
>> + to force the corresponding device to operate at its maximum
>> + operable frequency instaneously and temporarily. After a
>> + designated duration has passed, the operating frequency returns
>> + to normal. When a user reads the tickle entry, it returns
>> + the number of tickle executions for the device. When a user
>> + writes to the tickle entry with the tickle duration in ms,
>> + the effect of device tickling is held for the designated
>> + duration. Note that the duration is rounded-up by
>> + the value DEVFREQ_INTERVAL defined in devfreq.c
>> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-power b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-power
>> index b464d12..4d8434b 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-power
>> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-power
>> @@ -172,3 +172,46 @@ Description:
>>
>> Reading from this file will display the current value, which is
>> set to 1 MB by default.
>> +
>> +What: /sys/power/devfreq/
>> +Date: May 2011
>> +Contact: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
>> +Description:
>> + The /sys/power/devfreq directory will contain files that will
>> + provide a unified interface to the DEVFREQ, a generic DVFS
>> + (dynamic voltage and frequency scaling) framework.
>> +
>> +What: /sys/power/devfreq/tickle_all
>> +Date: May 2011
>> +Contact: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
>> +Description:
>> + The /sys/power/devfreq/tickle_all file allows user space to
>> + force every device with DEVFREQ to operate at the maximum
>> + frequency of the device instaneously and temporarily. After
>> + a designated delay has passed, the operating frequency returns
>> + to normal. If a user reads the tickle_all entry, it returns
>> + the number of tickle_all executions. When writing to the
>> + tickle_all entry, the user should supply with the duration of
>> + tickle in ms (the "designated delay" mentioned before). Then,
>> + the effect of tickle_all will hold for the denoted duration.
>> + Note that the duration is rounded by the monitoring period
>> + defined by DEVFREQ_INTERVAL in /drivers/base/power/devfreq.c.
>> +
>> +What: /sys/power/devfreq/min_interval
>> +Date: May 2011
>> +Contact: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
>> +Description:
>> + The /sys/power/devfreq/min_interval file shows the monitoring
>> + period defined by DEVFREQ_INTERVAL in
>> + /drivers/base/power/devfreq.c. The duration of device tickling
>> + is rounded-up by DEVFREQ_INTERVAL.
>> +
>> +What: /sys/power/devfreq/monitoring
>> +Date: May 2011
>> +Contact: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
>> +Description:
>> + The /sys/power/devfreq/monitoring file shows whether DEVFREQ
>> + is periodically monitoring. Periodic monitoring is activated
>> + if there is a device that wants periodic monitoring for DVFS or
>> + there is a device that is tickled (and the tickling duration is
>> + not yet expired).
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/devfreq.c b/drivers/base/power/devfreq.c
>> index 7648a94..709c138 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/power/devfreq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/power/devfreq.c
>> @@ -40,6 +40,9 @@ static LIST_HEAD(devfreq_list);
>> /* Exclusive access to devfreq_list and its elements */
>> static DEFINE_MUTEX(devfreq_list_lock);
>>
>> +static struct kobject *devfreq_kobj;
>> +static struct attribute_group dev_attr_group;
>> +
>> /**
>> * find_device_devfreq() - find devfreq struct using device pointer
>> * @dev: device pointer used to lookup device DEVFREQ.
>> @@ -237,6 +240,8 @@ int devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev, struct devfreq_dev_profile *profile,
>> queue_delayed_work(devfreq_wq, &devfreq_work,
>> msecs_to_jiffies(DEVFREQ_INTERVAL));
>> }
>> +
>> + sysfs_update_group(&dev->kobj, &dev_attr_group);
>
> This appears to modify the attributes of the device, but anything like it is
> not mentioned in the documentation. What's up?
It is mentioned "Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-devfreq".
>
>> out:
>> mutex_unlock(&devfreq_list_lock);
>>
>> @@ -263,6 +268,8 @@ int devfreq_remove_device(struct device *dev)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> + sysfs_remove_group(&dev->kobj, &dev_attr_group);
>> +
>> list_del(&devfreq->node);
>>
>> kfree(devfreq);
>> @@ -344,7 +351,7 @@ static int _devfreq_tickle_device(struct devfreq *df, unsigned long delay)
>> if (devfreq_wq && !polling) {
>> polling = true;
>> queue_delayed_work(devfreq_wq, &devfreq_work,
>> - msecs_to_jiffies(DEVFREQ_INTERVAL));
>> + msecs_to_jiffies(DEVFREQ_INTERVAL));
>
> This change doesn't seem to belong to this patch.
Oops. I'll rearrange the patch series.
>
>> }
>>
>> return err;
>> @@ -382,6 +389,116 @@ int devfreq_tickle_device(struct device *dev, unsigned long duration_ms)
>> return err;
>> }
>>
>> +static int num_tickle_all;
>> +static ssize_t tickle_all(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>> + const char *buf, size_t count)
>> +{
>> + int duration = 0;
>> + struct devfreq *tmp;
>> + unsigned long delay;
>> +
>> + sscanf(buf, "%d", &duration);
>> + if (duration < DEVFREQ_INTERVAL)
>> + duration = DEVFREQ_INTERVAL;
>> +
>> + if (unlikely(IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev))) {
>> + pr_err("%s: Invalid parameters\n", __func__);
>
> Please say "null device" instead of in addition to the above.
Ok. I'll let it say "Null or invalid device" as it's IS_ERR_OR_NULL.
>
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + delay = DIV_ROUND_UP(duration, DEVFREQ_INTERVAL);
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&devfreq_list_lock);
>> + list_for_each_entry(tmp, &devfreq_list, node) {
>> + _devfreq_tickle_device(tmp, delay);
>> + }
>> + mutex_unlock(&devfreq_list_lock);
>> +
>> + num_tickle_all++;
>> + return count;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t show_num_tickle_all(struct device *dev,
>> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> +{
>> + return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", num_tickle_all);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t show_min_interval(struct device *dev,
>> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> +{
>> + return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", DEVFREQ_INTERVAL);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t show_monitoring(struct device *dev,
>> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> +{
>> + return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", monitoring ? 1 : 0);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR(tickle_all, 0644, show_num_tickle_all, tickle_all);
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR(min_interval, 0444, show_min_interval, NULL);
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR(monitoring, 0444, show_monitoring, NULL);
>> +static struct attribute *devfreq_entries[] = {
>> + &dev_attr_tickle_all.attr,
>> + &dev_attr_min_interval.attr,
>> + &dev_attr_monitoring.attr,
>> + NULL,
>> +};
>> +static struct attribute_group devfreq_attr_group = {
>> + .name = NULL,
>> + .attrs = devfreq_entries,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static ssize_t tickle(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>> + const char *buf, size_t count)
>> +{
>> + int duration;
>> + struct devfreq *df;
>> + unsigned long delay;
>> +
>> + sscanf(buf, "%d", &duration);
>> + if (duration < DEVFREQ_INTERVAL)
>> + duration = DEVFREQ_INTERVAL;
>> +
>> + if (unlikely(IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev))) {
>> + pr_err("%s: Invalid parameters\n", __func__);
>
> Like above.
Yup.
>
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + delay = DIV_ROUND_UP(duration, DEVFREQ_INTERVAL);
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&devfreq_list_lock);
>> + df = find_device_devfreq(dev);
>> + _devfreq_tickle_device(df, delay);
>> + mutex_unlock(&devfreq_list_lock);
>> +
>> + return count;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t show_num_tickle(struct device *dev,
>> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> +{
>> + struct devfreq *df;
>> +
>> + df = find_device_devfreq(dev);
>> +
>> + if (!IS_ERR(df))
>> + return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", df->num_tickle);
>> +
>> + return PTR_ERR(df);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR(tickle, 0644, show_num_tickle, tickle);
>> +static struct attribute *dev_entries[] = {
>> + &dev_attr_tickle.attr,
>> + NULL,
>> +};
>> +static struct attribute_group dev_attr_group = {
>> + .name = "devfreq",
>> + .attrs = dev_entries,
>> +};
>> +
>> static int __init devfreq_init(void)
>> {
>> mutex_lock(&devfreq_list_lock);
>> @@ -389,6 +506,20 @@ static int __init devfreq_init(void)
>> polling = false;
>> devfreq_wq = create_freezable_workqueue("devfreq_wq");
>> INIT_DELAYED_WORK_DEFERRABLE(&devfreq_work, devfreq_monitor);
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
>> + /* Create sysfs */
>> + devfreq_kobj = kobject_create_and_add("devfreq", power_kobj);
>
> Hmm, so power_kobj is global? It shouldn't be.
Yes, it is global and it's declared at include/linux/kobject.h.
>
> Generally, whatever adds attributes to /sys/power should be located in
> kernel/power/ .
I've put it at /sys/power because these attributes are global to every
device with devfreq.
Anyway, if you think that's a weird location for it, could you please
give me some hints on where would be proper to locate system-wide
devfreq sysfs attributes?
Or, do you think kernel/power/devfreq.c would be a proper location for devfreq?
Or, what about allowing every /sys/devices/.../devfreq/global/* to be
the same "global" attributes of devfreq?
>
>> + if (!devfreq_kobj) {
>> + pr_err("Unable to create DEVFREQ kobject.\n");
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> + if (sysfs_create_group(devfreq_kobj, &devfreq_attr_group)) {
>> + pr_err("Unable to create DEVFREQ sysfs entries.\n");
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +#endif
>> +out:
>> mutex_unlock(&devfreq_list_lock);
>>
>> devfreq_monitor(&devfreq_work.work);
>> diff --git a/include/linux/devfreq.h b/include/linux/devfreq.h
>> index 1ec9a40..69334e7 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/devfreq.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/devfreq.h
>> @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ struct devfreq_governor {
>> * at each executino of devfreq_monitor, tickle is decremented.
>> * User may tickle a device-devfreq in order to set maximum
>> * frequency instaneously with some guaranteed duration.
>> + * @num_tickle number of tickle calls.
>> *
>> * This structure stores the DEVFREQ information for a give device.
>> */
>> @@ -72,6 +73,8 @@ struct devfreq {
>> unsigned long previous_freq;
>> unsigned int next_polling;
>> unsigned int tickle;
>> +
>> + unsigned int num_tickle;
>> };
>>
>> #if defined(CONFIG_PM_DEVFREQ)
>
> It looks like the above two changes should be moved to a separate patch.
These two changes are for the sysfs interface as counting number of
tickle is added with sysfs interface.
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
Thank you,
- MyungJoo
--
MyungJoo Ham (함명주), Ph.D.
Mobile Software Platform Lab,
Digital Media and Communications (DMC) Business
Samsung Electronics
cell: 82-10-6714-2858
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists