[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4E1187E4020000780004BF2C@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 08:29:08 +0100
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...ell.com>
To: "Frederic Weisbecker" <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@...hat.com>,
"LKML" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] x86: Remove useless unwinder backlink from irq
regs saving
>>> On 02.07.11 at 18:29, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> The unwinder backlink in interrupt entry is very useless.
> It's actually not part of the stack frame chain and thus is
> never used.
I very much doubt this - see dump_trace()'s comment in its IRQ-stack
related code portion (and the corresponding use of irq_stack_end[-1]).
Jan
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
> Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S | 1 -
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
> index 20dc8e6..6131432 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
> @@ -327,7 +327,6 @@ ENDPROC(native_usergs_sysret64)
> jne 2f
> mov PER_CPU_VAR(irq_stack_ptr),%rsp
> EMPTY_FRAME 0
> - pushq_cfi %rbp /* backlink for unwinder */
> /*
> * We entered an interrupt context - irqs are off:
> */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists