linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -tip, final] perf, x86: Add hw_watchdog_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110705105959.GA14435@elte.hu>
Date:	Tue, 5 Jul 2011 12:59:59 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc:	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip, final] perf, x86: Add hw_watchdog_set_attr() in a
 sake of nmi-watchdog on P4


* Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 12:20:17PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote:
> ...
> > 
> > So why don't we simply set this for all PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES 
> > events in the P4 PMU driver? That would remove half of the patch 
> > AFAICS.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > 	Ingo
> 
> Unfortunately it doesn't solve the main issue -- nmi-watchdog events
> and cpu clock events should be a separate events with non-intersected
> ESCRs, otherwise nmi-watchdog and cpu-cycles can't operate simultaneously
> like other PMUs does.
> 
> non-sleeping ticks use
> 
> 	[P4_EVENT_EXECUTION_EVENT] = {
> 		.escr_msr	= { MSR_P4_CRU_ESCR2, MSR_P4_CRU_ESCR3 },
> 		.cntr		= { {12, 13, 16}, {14, 15, 17}
> 	},
> 
> while cpu-cycles
> 
> 	[P4_EVENT_GLOBAL_POWER_EVENTS] = {
> 		.escr_msr	= { MSR_P4_FSB_ESCR0, MSR_P4_FSB_ESCR1 },
> 		.cntr		= { {0, -1, -1}, {2, -1, -1} },
> 	},

are 'non-sleeping ticks' non-halted cycles - i.e. cycles that always 
count with CPU frequency and can thus be used for periodic 
frequencies?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/