linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/11] MFD: DA9052 MFD core module v1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201107051433.59235.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Tue, 5 Jul 2011 14:33:59 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Ashish Jangam <Ashish.Jangam@...tcummins.com>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	"sameo@...nedhand.com" <sameo@...nedhand.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dajun <dajun.chen@...semi.com>,
	"linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/11] MFD: DA9052 MFD core module v1

On Tuesday 05 July 2011, Ashish Jangam wrote:
> DA9053 chip submission was done by Linaro and now they have agreed that
> we will be only responsible for DA9053 submission too so now we can
> skip the posted DA9053 patch.

Ok.

> Regarding file naming convention da9052 seems to be appropriate since 
> DA9053 chip is update of DA9052 and also DA9052 is the umbrella name
> for the whole family.

What about the existing da903x drivers for leds, touchscreen, battery,
regulator and backlight? Are they all completely distinct from the
da905x line?

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/