[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110705135153.GG5551@somewhere>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 15:51:57 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockup detector: CONFIG_DETECT_SOFTLOCKUP no longer
exists
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 01:32:40PM +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote:
>
> Replace CONFIG_DETECT_SOFTLOCKUP with CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> ---
>
> Index: linux-2.6-work/lib/Kconfig.debug
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-work.orig/lib/Kconfig.debug 2011-07-05 12:47:23.728166985 +1000
> +++ linux-2.6-work/lib/Kconfig.debug 2011-07-05 12:47:40.478462898 +1000
> @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ config BOOTPARAM_SOFTLOCKUP_PANIC_VALUE
> config DETECT_HUNG_TASK
> bool "Detect Hung Tasks"
> depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
> - default DETECT_SOFTLOCKUP
> + default LOCKUP_DETECTOR
> help
> Say Y here to enable the kernel to detect "hung tasks",
> which are bugs that cause the task to be stuck in
> @@ -866,7 +866,7 @@ config BOOT_PRINTK_DELAY
> system, and then set "lpj=M" before setting "boot_delay=N".
> NOTE: Using this option may adversely affect SMP systems.
> I.e., processors other than the first one may not boot up.
> - BOOT_PRINTK_DELAY also may cause DETECT_SOFTLOCKUP to detect
> + BOOT_PRINTK_DELAY also may cause LOCKUP_DETECTOR to detect
> what it believes to be lockup conditions.
>
> config RCU_TORTURE_TEST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists