[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1462382.yEDobJovyP@barack>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 17:10:13 +0300
From: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
To: "Balbi, Felipe" <balbi@...com>
CC: "Girdwood, Liam" <lrg@...com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
"Lopez Cruz, Misael" <misael.lopez@...com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] input: twl6040-vibra: Do not use wrapper for irq request
On Tuesday 05 July 2011 15:57:46 Balbi, Felipe wrote:
> > + info->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > + if (!info->irq) {
>
> this is wrong. platform_get_irq() will return -ENXIO if it can't find
> the IRQ you requested:
>
> 55 /**
> 56 * platform_get_irq - get an IRQ for a device
> 57 * @dev: platform device
> 58 * @num: IRQ number index
> 59 */
> 60 int platform_get_irq(struct platform_device *dev, unsigned int num)
> 61 {
> 62 struct resource *r = platform_get_resource(dev, IORESOURCE_IRQ,
> num); 63
> 64 return r ? r->start : -ENXIO;
> 65 }
> 66 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_get_irq);
Yes, I have not checked that..
Will replace the check with (info->irq< 0) checks in both slaves.
Thanks for noticing it!
I'll wait a bit for other comments, and will resend.
--
Péter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists