linux-kernel - Re: [TOME] Re: [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110705144846.GA13548@dumpdata.com>
Date:	Tue, 5 Jul 2011 07:48:46 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To:	Raghavendra D Prabhu <rprabhu@...hang.net>
Cc:	Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [TOME] Re: [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix

> >>xen_register_gsi and hence, xen_register_pirq are called from
> >>init (with xen_setup_acpi_sci) and non-init (with
> >>acpi_register_gsi_xen); since xen_set_acpi_sci calls it with gsi ==
> >>acpi_sci_override_gsi and is marked __init, the best way would be to
> >>call xen_register_gsi and xen_register_pirq with a boolean argument like
> >>sci_override to obviate the need to use acpi_sci_override_gsi in
> >>register_pirq. I will send the patch with this change if it looks good.
> >
> >Hold on, let me rebase #stable/pci.cleanups and see if the issue
> >here disappears.
> Thanks, will wait until the rebase and test after that.

Hm, it actually looks like it wont do the trick. Why don't you send
a patch against 3.0-rc6 with the outlined mechanism mentioned above.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/