[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110705061903.GD1625@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 23:19:03 -0700
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
Donggeun Kim <dg77.kim@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] MFD: MAX8997: IRQ definition moved to public header.
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 02:57:54PM +0900, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Mark Brown
> > My understanding was that one of the goals of the power_supply subsystem
> > was to support this sort of interaction? This (and your subsequent
> > paragraphs) all sounds entirely sensible but it should be being dealt
> > with at a higher level with the various charger drivers delivering
> > events into a subsystem or board driver which coordinates them all. It
> > seems like the driver should be doing the work of dealing with the
> > actual interrupts.
> Yes, I also think that it is supposed to read and update attributes of
> chargers. However, I don't see any ways to interconnect chargers and
> related devices with power_supply subsystem.
Nor do I, but this is just software so we should be able to make it do
what's needed here.
> If we let a user process interconnect the chargers and related
> devices, we need to allow userland to access (both read and write)
I didn't say anything about userspace, and I wouldn't expect userspace
to do anything except policy here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists