[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110705163121.608aa8ed.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 16:31:21 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: fixes while rebasing the akpm tree
Hi all,
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 16:28:16 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> While rebasing the akpm tree onto today's linux-next, I discovered the
> following:
>
> The patch hfsplus-add-missing-call-to-bio_put.patch appears to be already
> applied (as commit 50176ddefa4a ("hfsplus: add missing call to bio_put()"
> from the hfsplus tree).
>
> The patches
> x86-mtrr-lock-stop-machine-during-mtrr-rendezvous-sequence.patch,
> stop_machine-reorganize-stop_cpus-implementation.patch and
> stop_machine-implement-stop_machine_from_inactive_cpu.patch seem to be
> already applied (as commits 6d3321e8e2b3 ("x86, mtrr: lock stop machine
> during MTRR rendezvous sequence"), fd7355ba1e93 ("stop_machine:
> reorganize stop_cpus() implementation") and f740e6cd0cb5 ("stop_machine:
> implement stop_machine_from_inactive_cpu()") from the tip tree)
I have removed all the above patches from the akpm tree today as well as
x86-mtrr-use-stop_machine-apis-for-doing-mtrr-rendezvous.patch which is
also in the tip tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists