[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110705085032.GA3169@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 10:50:32 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Hu Tao <hutao@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...il.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/16] CFS Bandwidth Control v7
* Hu Tao <hutao@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> perf diff output:
>
> # Baseline Delta Shared Object Symbol
> # ........ .......... ................. ...........................
> #
> 0.00% +10.07% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __lock_acquire
> 0.00% +5.90% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] lock_release
> 0.00% +4.86% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] trace_hardirqs_off_caller
> 0.00% +4.06% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] debug_smp_processor_id
> 0.00% +4.00% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] lock_acquire
> 0.00% +3.81% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] lock_acquired
> 0.00% +3.71% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] lock_is_held
> 0.00% +3.04% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] validate_chain
> 0.00% +2.68% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] check_chain_key
> 0.00% +2.41% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] trace_hardirqs_off
> 0.00% +2.01% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] trace_hardirqs_on_caller
Oh, please measure with lockdep (CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) turned off. No
production kernel has it enabled and it has quite some overhead (as
visible in the profile), skewing results.
> 2.04% -0.09% pipe-test-100k [.] main
> 0.00% +1.79% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] add_preempt_count
I'd also suggest to turn off CONFIG_PREEMPT_DEBUG.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists