[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1309946225.634.165.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 10:57:05 +0100
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...citrix.com>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"Frederic Weisbecker" <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: drop unnecessary kernel_eflags variable from
64 bit.
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 10:46 +0100, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 10:25:29AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> ...
> > >
> > > The whole series looks good to me, thanks Ian! I hope I don't
> > > miss anything, so lets wait for more feedback ;)
> >
> > Thanks. Actually I missed the extern declaration in asm/processor.h so
> > this updated patch should be used instead:
> >
>
> Great, thanks Ian. Have you a chance to run this series? ;)
Yeah I booted it before I posted it. I figured that the initscripts etc
would be a sufficient test of fork() and that if it were wrong it would
fall over pretty quickly and obviously.
Ian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists