[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110706101456.GN8286@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 11:14:56 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuzmichev <vkuzmichev@...sta.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/6] arm_smp_twd: mpcore_wdt: Fix MPCORE watchdog
setup
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 11:05:51AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Hi Vitaly,
>
> On 05/07/11 20:00, Vitaly Kuzmichev wrote:
> > The series of patches fixes various bugs in ARM MPCORE watchdog setup.
> > They also introduce some changes in common ARM_SMP_TWD timer setup code.
> > The PATCH 2/6 adds an exported function to obtain twd timer rate in
> > mpcore_wdt. However, this solution might be unacceptable, and the
> > better is to copy calibration loop and clk_get_rate calling to mpcore_wdt.
>
> My take on this is that the calibration loop should simply be killed
> once Colin's patch using the "smp_twd" clock is merged and relevant
> platforms updated. Once this is done, the watchdog driver should use the
> clock directly, without exporting a symbol.
Do we know why the calibration was initially introduced? FWIR, it came
from the SMP group in ARM, so I guess they had a reason for it rather
than copying x86.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists