lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 06 Jul 2011 12:33:55 +0200
From:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
CC:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	stable@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH] fs: fix lock initialization

From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>

locks_alloc_lock() assumed that the allocated struct file_lock is
already initialized to zero members.  This is only true for the first
allocation of the structure, after reuse some of the members will have
random values.

This will for example result in passing random fl_start values to
userspace in fuse for FL_FLOCK locks, which is an information leak at
best.

Fix by reinitializing those members which may be non-zero after freeing.

Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
CC: stable@...nel.org
---
 fs/locks.c |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/fs/locks.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/locks.c	2011-07-04 17:06:01.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6/fs/locks.c	2011-07-04 17:06:04.000000000 +0200
@@ -160,10 +160,28 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unlock_flocks);
 
 static struct kmem_cache *filelock_cache __read_mostly;
 
+static void locks_init_lock_always(struct file_lock *fl)
+{
+	fl->fl_next = NULL;
+	fl->fl_fasync = NULL;
+	fl->fl_owner = NULL;
+	fl->fl_pid = 0;
+	fl->fl_nspid = NULL;
+	fl->fl_file = NULL;
+	fl->fl_flags = 0;
+	fl->fl_type = 0;
+	fl->fl_start = fl->fl_end = 0;
+}
+
 /* Allocate an empty lock structure. */
 struct file_lock *locks_alloc_lock(void)
 {
-	return kmem_cache_alloc(filelock_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
+	struct file_lock *fl = kmem_cache_alloc(filelock_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
+
+	if (fl)
+		locks_init_lock_always(fl);
+
+	return fl;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(locks_alloc_lock);
 
@@ -200,17 +218,9 @@ void locks_init_lock(struct file_lock *f
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fl->fl_link);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fl->fl_block);
 	init_waitqueue_head(&fl->fl_wait);
-	fl->fl_next = NULL;
-	fl->fl_fasync = NULL;
-	fl->fl_owner = NULL;
-	fl->fl_pid = 0;
-	fl->fl_nspid = NULL;
-	fl->fl_file = NULL;
-	fl->fl_flags = 0;
-	fl->fl_type = 0;
-	fl->fl_start = fl->fl_end = 0;
 	fl->fl_ops = NULL;
 	fl->fl_lmops = NULL;
+	locks_init_lock_always(fl);
 }
 
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(locks_init_lock);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ