linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] watchdog: mpcore_wdt Add reload value setting for CNS3xxx hardware

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110706112830.GA23184@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
Date:	Wed, 6 Jul 2011 15:28:31 +0400
From:	Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com>
To:	tommy.lin@...iumnetworks.com
Cc:	'Tommy Lin' <tommy.lin.1101@...il.com>,
	'Wim Van Sebroeck' <wim@...ana.be>,
	linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Lin, Mac" <Mac.Lin@...iumnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] watchdog: mpcore_wdt Add reload value setting for
 CNS3xxx hardware

On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 03:16:16PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 06:05:37PM +0800, Tommy Lin wrote:
> > Hi, I just found another patch that can solve the watchdog counter reload
> > issue. Please ignore this patch, since it should not acceptable to use
> > #ifdefs.
> 
> OK, great. Do I understand correctly that without Vitaly's patch,
> your first patch is somewhat useless, as the watchdog will not work
> or will work incorrectly? So should I postpone merging patch 1/2
> until Vitaly's patch hit mainline?

Oh, I see that the issue isn't major, so I'll just merge the first
patch.

Thanks!

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
Email: cbouatmailru@...il.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/