lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E1450D9.3040601@mvista.com>
Date:	Wed, 06 Jul 2011 16:11:05 +0400
From:	Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>
To:	Vitaly Kuzmichev <vkuzmichev@...sta.com>
CC:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
	John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arm@...nel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 6/6] mpcore_wdt: Move declarations in a separate header

Hello.

On 05-07-2011 23:00, Vitaly Kuzmichev wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuzmichev<vkuzmichev@...sta.com>
> ---
>   drivers/watchdog/mpcore_wdt.c |   26 +-------------------------
>   drivers/watchdog/mpcore_wdt.h |   40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 drivers/watchdog/mpcore_wdt.h

    Are the declarations only used by mpcore_wdt.c? If so, why we need a header?

WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ