[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E145F6D.8010708@mvista.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 17:13:17 +0400
From: Vitaly Kuzmichev <vkuzmichev@...sta.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>, arm@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/6] mpcore_wdt: Fix WDIOC_SETOPTIONS handling
Hi Arnd,
On 07/06/2011 04:22 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 July 2011, Vitaly Kuzmichev wrote:
>>
>> According to the include/linux/watchdog.h WDIOC_SETOPTIONS is
>> classified as 'read from device' ioctl call:
>> #define WDIOC_SETOPTIONS _IOR(WATCHDOG_IOCTL_BASE, 4, int)
>>
>> However, the driver 'mpcore_wdt' performs 'copy_from_user' only if
>> _IOC_WRITE is set, thus the local variable 'uarg' which is used in
>> WDIOC_SETOPTIONS handling remains uninitialized.
>>
>> The proper way to fix this is to bind WDIOC_SETOPTIONS to _IOW,
>> but this will break compatibility.
>> So adding additional condition for performing 'copy_from_user'.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuzmichev <vkuzmichev@...sta.com>
>
> Is the new watchdog driver core ready for 3.1? If so, the best
> solution would be to get rid of the entire ioctl function in
> the mpcore_wdt driver and just use the core for that.
In this case the whole mpcore_wdt driver should be rewritten.
And then this should be done in a separate set of patches, I think.
And this may take more time than is seems now.
So I would keep this patch.
Thanks,
Vitaly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists