[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1107061034200.14596@xanadu.home>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 10:37:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
'Daniel Walker' <dwalker@...eaurora.org>,
'Jonathan Corbet' <corbet@....net>,
'Mel Gorman' <mel@....ul.ie>,
'Chunsang Jeong' <chunsang.jeong@...aro.org>,
'Jesse Barker' <jesse.barker@...aro.org>,
'KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki' <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
'Michal Nazarewicz' <mina86@...a86.com>,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
'Kyungmin Park' <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
'Ankita Garg' <ankita@...ibm.com>,
'Andrew Morton' <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 6/8] drivers: add Contiguous Memory
Allocator
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> Another issue is that when a platform has restricted DMA regions,
> they typically don't fall into the highmem zone. As the dmabounce
> code allocates from the DMA coherent allocator to provide it with
> guaranteed DMA-able memory, that would be rather inconvenient.
Do we encounter this in practice i.e. do those platforms requiring large
contiguous allocations motivating this work have such DMA restrictions?
Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists