[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110706125329.6e5bdd1a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 12:53:29 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo F. Padovan" <padovan@...fusion.mobi>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the wireless-current
tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the net tree got a conflict in
net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c between commit 9fa7e4f76f36 ("Bluetooth: Fix
regression with incoming L2CAP connections") from the wireless-current
tree and commit 89bc500e41fc ("Bluetooth: Add state tracking to struct
l2cap_chan") from the net tree.
I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
index ebff14c,9ec9c8c..0000000
--- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
@@@ -2323,8 -2530,7 +2530,8 @@@ static inline int l2cap_config_req(stru
sk = chan->sk;
- if ((bt_sk(sk)->defer_setup && sk->sk_state != BT_CONNECT2) ||
- (!bt_sk(sk)->defer_setup && sk->sk_state != BT_CONFIG)) {
- if (chan->state != BT_CONFIG) {
++ if ((bt_sk(sk)->defer_setup && chan->state != BT_CONNECT2) ||
++ (!bt_sk(sk)->defer_setup && chan->state != BT_CONFIG)) {
struct l2cap_cmd_rej rej;
rej.reason = cpu_to_le16(0x0002);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists