linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5 v2] PCI: fix cardbus and sriov regressions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110706104648.312ba4c7@jbarnes-desktop>
Date:	Wed, 6 Jul 2011 10:46:48 -0700
From:	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
To:	Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	yinghai@...nel.org, bhutchings@...arflare.com,
	socketcan@...tkopp.net, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
	linux@...inikbrodowski.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 v2] PCI: fix cardbus and sriov regressions

On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 01:53:16 -0700
Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 02:30:00PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > and I'd really change the function argument to take that kind of
> > simplified thing instead.
> > 
> > And that cleanup/re-organization would be prime material for a totally
> > independent patch that changes no semantics at all, just prepares for
> > the other changes.
> > 
> > That way the final "patch 2" would be smaller and do the semantic
> > changes, instead of being a mix of semantic changes and infrastructure
> > changes.
> > 
> > And some of the cleanup stuff I could merge for 3.0 just to make things easier.
> > 
> > Hmm?
> 
> Here is a cleaned up patch that just adds functionality to kernel/resource.c
> It does make a small semantic addition to allocate_resource(), where it reallocates
> the resource with a newer size if that resource was already allocated.
> 
> Will this be acceptable for 3.0.0?

Up to Linus, I have no problem with the patch though, it seems like a
good cleanup and is good to keep separate from the other patches.  Once
it lands I can queue up the dependent patches in -next.

Thanks,
-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/