lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110706132138.7e65a912.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 6 Jul 2011 13:21:38 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc:	richard@....at, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][Resend v2] Fix infinite loop in search_binary_handler()

On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 20:28:18 +0900
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp> wrote:

> Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > But IMHO adding a new attribute to task_struct is a bit overkill.
> Indeed. I came up with a simpler solution. ;-)
> ----------------------------------------
> [PATCH] exec: Do not call request_module() twice from search_binary_handler().
> 
> Currently, search_binary_handler() tries to load binary loader module using
> request_module() if a loader for the requested program is not yet loaded. But
> second attempt of request_module() does not affect the result of
> search_binary_handler().
> 
> If request_module() triggered recursion, calling request_module() twice causes
> 2 to the power of MAX_KMOD_CONCURRENT (= 50) repetitions. It is not an infinite
> loop but is sufficient for users to consider as a hang up.
> 
> Therefore, this patch changes not to call request_module() twice, making
> 1 to the power of MAX_KMOD_CONCURRENT repetitions in case of recursion.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
> ---
> diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
> index 6075a1e..044c13f 100644
> --- a/fs/exec.c
> +++ b/fs/exec.c
> @@ -1411,6 +1411,8 @@ int search_binary_handler(struct linux_binprm *bprm,struct pt_regs *regs)
>  			    printable(bprm->buf[2]) &&
>  			    printable(bprm->buf[3]))
>  				break; /* -ENOEXEC */
> +			if (try)
> +				break; /* -ENOEXEC */
>  			request_module("binfmt-%04x", *(unsigned short *)(&bprm->buf[2]));
>  #endif
>  		}

What is that "for (try=0; try<2" loop actually there for?  To retry
after the request_module(), it appears.  Which is pointless if
!CONFIG_MODULES.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ