[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201107062326.53737.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 23:26:53 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>, linux@....linux.org.uk,
Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>, workgroup.linux@....com,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, tglx@...utronix.de,
weizeng.he@....com,
"Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] ARM: l2x0: Add OF based initialization
On Wednesday 06 July 2011 23:02:37 Grant Likely wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 03:42:59PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
> >
> > This adds probing for ARM L2x0 cache controllers via device tree. Support
> > includes the L210, L220, and PL310 controllers. The binding allows setting
> > up cache RAM latencies and filter addresses (PL310 only).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
>
> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
>
> By rights, this should go via the arm tree, but it depends on patches
> that are already in devicetree/next. Arnd, how do you want to handle
> this? I want to avoid rebasing devicetree/next.
It's outside of the scope of the arm-soc tree really, the l2x0 code
is clearly core arm stuff, so it belongs into Russell's tree.
I think it's best if Russell can provide an Ack for this and you
put it in the tree that already has the dependencies.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists