linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6 v2] arm: omap: usb: global Suspend and resume support of ehci and ohci

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 7 Jul 2011 01:17:39 +0300
From:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To:	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>
Cc:	balbi@...com, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	Partha Basak <p-basak2@...com>,
	Keshava Munegowda <keshava_mgowda@...com>,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Anand Gadiyar <gadiyar@...com>,
	sameo@...ux.intel.com, parthab@...ia.ti.com, tony@...mide.com,
	Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@...com>, paul@...an.com,
	johnstul@...ibm.com, Vishwanath Sripathy <vishwanath.bs@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6 v2] arm: omap: usb: global Suspend and resume support
 of ehci and ohci

Hi,

On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 12:20:40PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> >> +	if ((od->flags & OMAP_DEVICE_SUSPENDED) &&
> >> +	    (od->_state == OMAP_DEVICE_STATE_IDLE))
> >> +		omap_device_enable(pdev);
> >> +	
> >> +	return pm_generic_resume(dev);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>  static struct dev_power_domain omap_device_power_domain = {
> >>  	.ops = {
> >>  		.runtime_suspend = _od_runtime_suspend,
> >>  		.runtime_idle = _od_runtime_idle,
> >>  		.runtime_resume = _od_runtime_resume,
> >>  		USE_PLATFORM_PM_SLEEP_OPS
> >> +		.suspend = _od_suspend,
> >> +		.resume = _od_resume,
> >>  	}
> >>  };
> >
> > it all depends on when are you planning to get this patch upstream. I'm
> > considering getting some PM working on USB host and remove the
> > pm_runtime calls from system suspend/resume either during -rc or next
> > merge window.
> 
> Well, IMO it's way too late for this kind of change for -rc, so I'm
> considering it for the upcoming merge window.

yes, that's true. Who should take the hwmod patches btw ? I'm still
wondering if we should patch hwmod data first and push the _correct_ PM
part on 3.2.

-- 
balbi

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)