linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: drop unnecessary kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 6 Jul 2011 16:17:11 -0700
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Cc:	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: drop unnecessary kernel_eflags variable from 64
 bit.

> Well lets ask Linus and Andi?

The original idea was that if someone extends EFLAGS with new bits
the BIOS could set them.  Strictly said the Intel Manual 
specifies that ("reserved bits -- always set to values previously read")
 
But that never really worked out and I don't think anyone
would dare extending it now.  So hardcoding is fine I guess.

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/