[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110706235646.GC22814@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 16:56:46 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: reimth@...glemail.com
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>,
Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner@...bingen.mpg.de>,
Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
Tyson Whitehead <twhitehead@...il.com>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
Thomas Reim <rdratlos@...oo.co.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH 1/3] drm: Separate EDID Header Check from EDID
Block Check
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 01:30:12AM +0200, reimth@...glemail.com wrote:
> From: Thomas Reim <rdratlos@...oo.co.uk>
>
> Provides function drm_edid_header_is_valid() for EDID header check
> and replaces EDID header check part of function drm_edid_block_valid()
> by a call of drm_edid_header_is_valid().
> This is a prerequisite to extend DDC probing, e. g. in function
> radeon_ddc_probe() for Radeon devices, by a central EDID header check.
>
> Tested for kernel 2.35, 2.38 and 3.0
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Reim <rdratlos@...oo.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
> include/drm/drm_crtc.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
<formletter>
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree. Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
for how to do this properly.
</formletter>
Same goes for 2/3 and 3/3 as well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists