[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E1405C3.20904@q-leap.de>
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 08:50:43 +0200
From: Peter Kruse <pk@...eap.de>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
CC: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: I have a blaze of 353 page allocation failures, all alike
Hi there,
thanks for looking into this!
On 07/05/2011 07:20 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> There are also patches that should be in 2.6.32.29 like [e52af507:
> xfs: Non-blocking inode locking in IO completion] which talks
> about deadlocks during IO completion but the kernel name is
> 2.6.32.29-ql-server-20. Does that include this patch or is it some
> other fork?
it's not really a fork, we basically give the kernel a name.
Ok then I think we will schedule a kernel update and if the
server then runs for more than 40 days we could say that
the problem is fixed.
all the best,
Peter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists