| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 00:46:35 GMT
From: tip-bot for Daniel Drake <dsd@...top.org>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: grant.likely@...retlab.ca, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com, dsd@...top.org,
dilinger@...ued.net, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...ux.intel.com
Subject: [tip:x86/olpc] x86, olpc: Add missing elements to device tree
Commit-ID: f70d8ef4745349000dc599b6873a8b866289c694
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/f70d8ef4745349000dc599b6873a8b866289c694
Author: Daniel Drake <dsd@...top.org>
AuthorDate: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 17:34:08 +0100
Committer: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
CommitDate: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 14:44:19 -0700
x86, olpc: Add missing elements to device tree
In response to new device tree code in the kernel, OLPC will start
using it for probing of certain devices. However, some firmware fixes
are needed to put the devicetree into a usable state.
Retain compatibility with old firmware by fixing up the device tree
at boot-time if it does not contain the new nodes/properties that
we need for probing. This is the same approach taken on PPC platforms.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake <dsd@...top.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1309019658-1712-2-git-send-email-dsd@laptop.org
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Acked-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net>
Cc: devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc_dt.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc_dt.c b/arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc_dt.c
index d39f63d..d6ee929 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc_dt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc_dt.c
@@ -165,6 +165,107 @@ static struct of_pdt_ops prom_olpc_ops __initdata = {
.pkg2path = olpc_dt_pkg2path,
};
+static phandle __init olpc_dt_finddevice(const char *path)
+{
+ phandle node;
+ const void *args[] = { path };
+ void *res[] = { &node };
+
+ if (olpc_ofw("finddevice", args, res)) {
+ pr_err("olpc_dt: finddevice failed!\n");
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if ((s32) node == -1)
+ return 0;
+
+ return node;
+}
+
+static int __init olpc_dt_interpret(const char *words)
+{
+ int result;
+ const void *args[] = { words };
+ void *res[] = { &result };
+
+ if (olpc_ofw("interpret", args, res)) {
+ pr_err("olpc_dt: interpret failed!\n");
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ return result;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Extract board revision directly from OFW device tree.
+ * We can't use olpc_platform_info because that hasn't been set up yet.
+ */
+static u32 __init olpc_dt_get_board_revision(void)
+{
+ phandle node;
+ __be32 rev;
+ int r;
+
+ node = olpc_dt_finddevice("/");
+ if (!node)
+ return 0;
+
+ r = olpc_dt_getproperty(node, "board-revision-int",
+ (char *) &rev, sizeof(rev));
+ if (r < 0)
+ return 0;
+
+ return be32_to_cpu(rev);
+}
+
+void __init olpc_dt_fixup(void)
+{
+ int r;
+ char buf[64];
+ phandle node;
+ u32 board_rev;
+
+ node = olpc_dt_finddevice("/battery@0");
+ if (!node)
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * If the battery node has a compatible property, we are running a new
+ * enough firmware and don't have fixups to make.
+ */
+ r = olpc_dt_getproperty(node, "compatible", buf, sizeof(buf));
+ if (r > 0)
+ return;
+
+ pr_info("PROM DT: Old firmware detected, applying fixes\n");
+
+ /* Add olpc,xo1-battery compatible marker to battery node */
+ olpc_dt_interpret("\" /battery@0\" find-device"
+ " \" olpc,xo1-battery\" +compatible"
+ " device-end");
+
+ board_rev = olpc_dt_get_board_revision();
+ if (!board_rev)
+ return;
+
+ if (board_rev >= olpc_board_pre(0xd0)) {
+ /* XO-1.5: add dcon device */
+ olpc_dt_interpret("\" /pci/display@1\" find-device"
+ " new-device"
+ " \" dcon\" device-name \" olpc,xo1-dcon\" +compatible"
+ " finish-device device-end");
+ } else {
+ /* XO-1: add dcon device, mark RTC as olpc,xo1-rtc */
+ olpc_dt_interpret("\" /pci/display@1,1\" find-device"
+ " new-device"
+ " \" dcon\" device-name \" olpc,xo1-dcon\" +compatible"
+ " finish-device device-end"
+ " \" /rtc\" find-device"
+ " \" olpc,xo1-rtc\" +compatible"
+ " device-end");
+ }
+}
+
void __init olpc_dt_build_devicetree(void)
{
phandle root;
@@ -172,6 +273,8 @@ void __init olpc_dt_build_devicetree(void)
if (!olpc_ofw_is_installed())
return;
+ olpc_dt_fixup();
+
root = olpc_dt_getsibling(0);
if (!root) {
pr_err("PROM: unable to get root node from OFW!\n");
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists