[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E164F51.3080301@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:29:05 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Anupam Chanda <achanda@...ira.com>
CC: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org,
stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com, jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com,
eddie.dong@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change hypervisor detection order
On 07/07/2011 11:19 AM, Anupam Chanda wrote:
> Detect Xen before HyperV because in Viridian compatibility mode Xen presents
> itself as HyperV.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anupam Chanda <achanda@...ira.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hypervisor.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hypervisor.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hypervisor.c
> index 8095f86..ca23091 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hypervisor.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hypervisor.c
> @@ -33,10 +33,10 @@
> static const __initconst struct hypervisor_x86 * const hypervisors[] =
> {
> &x86_hyper_vmware,
> - &x86_hyper_ms_hyperv,
> #ifdef CONFIG_XEN_PVHVM
> &x86_hyper_xen_hvm,
> #endif
> + &x86_hyper_ms_hyperv,
> };
>
> const struct hypervisor_x86 *x86_hyper;
Any reason to not hoist it to the top? I'm guessing Xen emulating
VMware is more likely than the opposite...
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists