[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110708001702.832763639@clark.kroah.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:17:16 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc: stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [104/107] xfrm: Fix off by one in the replay advance functions
2.6.39-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
[ Upstream commit e756682c8baa47da1648c0c016e9f48ed66bc32d ]
We may write 4 byte too much when we reinitialize the anti replay
window in the replay advance functions. This patch fixes this by
adjusting the last index of the initialization loop.
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c
@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static void xfrm_replay_advance_bmp(stru
bitnr = bitnr & 0x1F;
replay_esn->bmp[nr] |= (1U << bitnr);
} else {
- nr = replay_esn->replay_window >> 5;
+ nr = (replay_esn->replay_window - 1) >> 5;
for (i = 0; i <= nr; i++)
replay_esn->bmp[i] = 0;
@@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ static void xfrm_replay_advance_esn(stru
bitnr = bitnr & 0x1F;
replay_esn->bmp[nr] |= (1U << bitnr);
} else {
- nr = replay_esn->replay_window >> 5;
+ nr = (replay_esn->replay_window - 1) >> 5;
for (i = 0; i <= nr; i++)
replay_esn->bmp[i] = 0;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists