linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Add device tree probe for imx/mxc gpio

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Message-ID: <20110708103622.GF26347@pengutronix.de>
Date:	Fri, 8 Jul 2011 12:36:22 +0200
From:	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc:	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, patches@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Add device tree probe for imx/mxc gpio

On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 01:27:05PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 12:37:40AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > The first patch removes the uses of cpu_is_mx(), the second one
> > changes mxc gpio number macro, and the third one adds actual device
> > tree probe support.
> > 
> > Changes since v2:
> >  * Keep platform case gpio range code path unchanged, and get range
> >    from gpio core only for dt case.
> > 
> > Changes since v1:
> >  * Address review comments given by Grant and Sascha
> >  * Add patch #1 to get gpio range/base from gpio core
> > 
> > Shawn Guo (3):
> >       gpio/mxc: get rid of the uses of cpu_is_mx()
> >       ARM: mxc: use ARCH_NR_GPIOS to define gpio number
> >       gpio/mxc: add device tree probe support
> 
> Sascha; so are we good?  Should I merge this series?

These patches neither fit onto your gpio tree nor on the i.MX tree. I
suggest that we give these patches a rest until both trees are merged.

That's the downside of moving core drivers to drivers/ and thus to
different maintainers, but I think things will become better once
the actual move is completed.

Sascha

> 
> g.
> 
> > 
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/fsl-imx-gpio.txt      |   22 +++
> >  arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx1.c                        |    8 +-
> >  arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx21.c                       |   12 +-
> >  arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx25.c                       |    9 +-
> >  arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx27.c                       |   13 +-
> >  arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx31.c                       |    6 +-
> >  arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx35.c                       |    7 +-
> >  arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm-mx50.c                        |   13 +-
> >  arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c                             |   24 ++--
> >  arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-gpio-mxc.c      |    4 +-
> >  arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h            |    2 +-
> >  arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/irqs.h              |   21 +---
> >  drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c                            |  157 +++++++++++++++++---
> >  13 files changed, 211 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives