linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] Core device subsystem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4E171E93.8020608@arm.com>
Date:	Fri, 08 Jul 2011 16:13:23 +0100
From:	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To:	Michał Mirosław <mirqus@...il.com>
CC:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] Core device subsystem

On 08/07/11 14:08, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> So you're basically folding of_core_device_populate() and
> core_driver_init_class() into one call, and generating the
> of_device_ids on the fly. If you're going down that road,
> it would be even simpler to directly use of_device_ids
> instead of core_device_ids and skip the generation altogether.
> 
> That would also remove the static declaration of devices to be
> probed in the architecture support code...
> 
> Let me think of it and prototype that.

See the attached patch against branch dt_gic_twd from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms.git

It boots fine on my PB11MP.

What do you think?

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
View attachment "code_dev.patch.txt" of type "text/plain" (5947 bytes)