[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYF6Z7CxhZVvuT8V+ENRd6K0q7=uhk93kOaOG-W3AvoTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 19:06:16 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: "Raju, Sundaram" <sundaram@...com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
Dan <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] dmaengine: Moving TI SDMA driver to dmaengine - design plan
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Raju, Sundaram <sundaram@...com> wrote:
> I would like to follow the Freescale i.MX DMA driver model,
> where imx-dma.c in drivers/dma which implements all the
> dmaengine hooks, internally uses the APIs in dma-v1.c file in
> arch/arm/mach-imx. All APIs in dma-v1.c are also exported
> out for direct use by clients.
>(...)
> Let me know your thoughts.
Sounds like a plan, just do it.
I think Samsung are currently using the scheme to migrate to
dmaengine as well.
Thanks,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists