linux-kernel - Re: [Update][PATCH 6/10] PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201107081956.29958.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Fri, 8 Jul 2011 19:56:29 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc:	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>,
	Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Subject: Re: [Update][PATCH 6/10] PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v5)

On Friday, July 08, 2011, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > On Friday, July 08, 2011, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> writes:
> > > 
> > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> > > >
> > > > Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions
> > > > (system suspend and hibernation).  Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw,
> > > > poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct
> > > > generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as
> > > > appropriate.
> > > >
> > > > The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains
> > > > that were powered down at run time (before the transition).  
> > > 
> > > Thinking about this some more, how is a driver supposed to reconfigure
> > > wakeups during suspend if it has already been runtime suspended?
> > 
> > If the device belongs to a PM domain that has been powered off, it
> > won't be notified.
> > 
> > > For example, assume a device where device_may_wakeup() == false.  This
> > > means wakeups during *suspend* are disabled, but wakeups wakeups are
> > > assumed to enabled when it is runtime suspended.
> > > 
> > > So now, assume this device is RPM_SUSPENDED, it has wakeups *enabled*,
> > > and then system suspend comes along.  
> > > 
> > > With this current patch, the driver will never receive any callbacks, so
> > > it can never disable its wakeups.  
> > >
> > > Am I missing something?
> > 
> > As I said above, this only happens with devices that belog to PM domains
> > that were powered off before system suspend has started, so the problem
> > is limited to devices that wakeup is signaled on behalf of even when they
> > have no power.
> > 
> > So this is a limitation, but not affecting all platforms.
> > 
> > There are a few ways to avoid this limitation I can think of:
> > (1) Add a "make me operational during system suspend" flag to struct dev_pm_info
> >     and run pm_runtime_resume() on such devices from the core (either dpm_prepare()
> >     core, or pm_genpd_prepare()).
> 
> What's to prevent the device from being runtime-suspended again before 
> the wakeup setting can be changed?

If we do it from pm_genpd_prepare() after this patch:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/7/8/223
the pm_runtime_get_noresume() (and the subsequent disabling of runtime PM)
will prevent this from happening.

> > (2) Add a "my .prepare() is safe to run if device is not accessible" flag to
> >     struct dev_pm_info and make pm_genpd_prepare() execute .prepare() for such
> >     devices regardless of whether or not their PM domains are off.
> > (3) Call .prepare() from all drivers unconditionally during system suspend
> >     (and probably .complete() too) in the hope they won't access inaccessible
> >     devices.
> > Probably, there's more.
> 
> In the PM domain's suspend code, do a runtime resume if the wakeup
> setting needs to be changed, rather than simply skipping over the
> device.

.suspend() is too late, we'd need to do that in .prepare().  If we did it
in .suspend(), we'd need to run .prepare() for all drivers, because at
this point we wouldn't know if the driver's .suspend() was going to be
called.  However, the driver's .prepare() may need to access the device,
which is going to fail if the whole domain is off at this point.

Also, we need a new flag that will tell the core code whether or not
the wakeup setting needs to be changed.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/