[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1107082222150.11049@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 22:22:45 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Cleanup PATCH] rcu: Do not use rcu_read_lock_held when calling
rcu_dereference_check
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Hmm, thinking about it some more. Wouldn't it make more sense to push
> > this through trivial tree (CCing Jikos)? Having 5 or so patches with the
> > exactly same changelog sounds overkill to me.
> >
> > What do you think? Could you give me your Acked-by if you are OK with
> > it, please?
>
> Whatever works. ;-)
>
> However, I did queue the Documentation/RCU/lockdep.txt patch already.
That's no problem for git. But anyway, I have dropped that part.
> For the others,
>
> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Thanks. Applied.
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists