[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110708230111.047815903@clark.kroah.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 16:00:31 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc: stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
Subject: [15/35] cfq-iosched: fix a rcu warning
2.6.33-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
commit 3181faa85bda3dc3f5e630a1846526c9caaa38e3 upstream.
I got a rcu warnning at boot. the ioc->ioc_data is rcu_deferenced, but
doesn't hold rcu_read_lock.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
block/cfq-iosched.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
@@ -2537,11 +2537,14 @@ static void __cfq_exit_single_io_context
cic->dead_key = (unsigned long) cic->key;
cic->key = NULL;
+ rcu_read_lock();
if (rcu_dereference(ioc->ioc_data) == cic) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
spin_lock(&ioc->lock);
rcu_assign_pointer(ioc->ioc_data, NULL);
spin_unlock(&ioc->lock);
- }
+ } else
+ rcu_read_unlock();
if (cic->cfqq[BLK_RW_ASYNC]) {
cfq_exit_cfqq(cfqd, cic->cfqq[BLK_RW_ASYNC]);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists