linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH x86/urgent 2/2] x86: Implement pfn -> nid mapping granularity check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4E181477.5090405@zytor.com>
Date:	Sat, 09 Jul 2011 01:42:31 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Conny Seidel <conny.seidel@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Hans Rosenfeld <hans.rosenfeld@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH x86/urgent 2/2] x86: Implement pfn -> nid mapping granularity
 check

On 07/09/2011 01:32 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> 
> Ping?  If the change is too invasive at this stage, we can disable AMD
> NUMA on x86_32 for 3.0 and queue these two for 3.1.
> 

I am kind of leaning that way... Hans, what is your opinion?

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/